Full Conversation
Professor, I reviewed your feedback on my presentation and I would like to understand how to improve the analysis.
That is a thoughtful point. Explain the evidence that led you to that conclusion.
You mentioned that my argument was descriptive. Could you show me where I should have moved from description to evaluation?
I can see the logic. Let us compare it with the other interpretation before deciding.
My main concern is to solve the problem without creating a second problem somewhere else.
That is sensible. We should consider both the immediate result and what happens afterwards.
I also struggled to connect the evidence to my recommendation without repeating the same point.
That sounds like a constructive approach. It would make the reasoning easier to evaluate.
If that option cannot be done exactly as proposed, I am open to a practical alternative as long as the key concern is addressed.
Good. That flexibility gives us room to find a solution without losing the main objective.
Would it be useful if I rewrote one section and brought it to your office hour for a quick review?
Good. Let us use that plan and make the next step specific.
Thank you. I appreciate having the reasoning and the next step made explicit.
You are welcome. Clear expectations usually prevent the same issue from returning.
Useful Expressions
- From my perspective…
- The biggest risk is…
- I’d propose that we…
- Let’s agree on a checkpoint.
Speak it aloud
Read the conversation once. Then choose one role and speak only that role aloud. On the second round, close the page after each line and try to respond naturally in your own words.
Practise This Situation with TimerPractice Challenge
Keep the same situation but change two details. For example, change the time, place, problem, preference or reason. Try to continue the conversation for one extra minute without reading.
